Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:52

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why is Taylor Swift re-recording her albums?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Key moments from the sixth week of Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ sex trafficking trial - AP News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
'Call of Duty: Black Ops 7' to Star Milo Ventimiglia, Kiernan Shipka - Variety
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is every dictators biggest fear?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
'Brady Bunch' Star Mourns Terrible Loss: 'My Heart is Broken' - Yahoo
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Logan Gilbert sees velocity dip in rehab start | Mariners injury updates - The Seattle Times
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.